27
Nov 10
publicado por Nuno Gouveia, às 01:07link do post | comentar

Chris Cillizza aponta, num interessante artigo no The Fix, as vulnerabilidades dos principais nomes referidos como candidatos republicanos à nomeação de 2012.  A vida não será fácil para nenhum deles. Aqui ficam as análises de Palin, Romney, Huckabee e Gingrich, os mais famosos da lista (destaques a bold meus).

 

Sarah Palin - Sarah Palin

Running a presidential campaign takes a lot of leadership, political know-how and qualified staff. Basically nobody in Republican politics thinks the former Alaska governor has any of the three. Being somebody's vice president means all of those things are already taken care of when you show up. Palin doesn't have that luxury this time. She has an insular style and mistrusts the GOP establishment. It will be fascinating to see whether a tea party-like campaign with unknown operatives running the show can work on the national level, but lots of smart people are betting against it. "She seems to be running for celebrity, not the highest office in the land," said political analyst Stu Rothenberg of the Rothenberg Political Report.

 

Mitt Romney - Health care

The biggest loser when Congress passed its health care bill this year might have been the former Massachusetts governor. That's because the bill is terribly unpopular among conservatives, and it put Romney's own health care dealings in perspective for the whole country. The bill Romney passed has often been described as similar to the federal bill -- a characterization he has been and will continue to fight after he launches his campaign. Romney's opponents are already calling it "Romneycare."

 

Newt Gingrich - Baggage

It's hard to pick the one thing from Gingrich's past that may haunt him. It could be the messy divorce (one of two for him), his time as speaker (former party leaders generally have a hard time becoming president) or his actions since leaving office, which have included backing liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava in the New York special election a year ago. Gingrich has spent a lot of time in the limelight, and that creates enemies and liabilities. There's plenty to mine if his campaign starts to gain steam.

 

Mike Huckabee - His campaign (or lack thereof)

Huckabee is still polling at or near the top of the potential 2012 field. He's got a great platform with his Fox News show. And he's talking about running again. But he's still not being given much of a chance by smart political observers, mostly because he hasn't corrected his major flaw from 2008 -- his lack of a strong campaign operation. Part of that problem is because Huckabee isn't well-liked among establishment Republicans, and part of it is because it didn't seem like he was all that keen on running again. One GOP strategist said Huckabee is in the "worst position of the would-be 2008 nominees. His consultants, staff and advisers are talking to other candidates. His supporters in the states are being courted by other campaigns." That's not a good starting post, even if you are high in the polls.

 


O que deixa tudo em aberto para outros potenciais candidatos com menos esqueletos, como Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty ou John Thune, ou até um mais inesperado que estes.

No que diz respeito a Newt Gingrich há outro senão: pelo menos desde a Guerra para cá nenhum membro ou ex-membro da Câmara dos Representantes foi nomeado candidato presidencial por um dos partidos.
Alexandre Burmester a 27 de Novembro de 2010 às 14:34

Acho que Gingrich tem um problema principal: ele é muito, muito inteligente, mas passa rapidamente do 8 ao 80. Durante uns anos, e até 2010, Gingrich comportou-se como um moderado, até andou em campanha nacional com Al Sharpton e outros democratas pela reforma no sector da Educação. Cheguei a ouvir algumas análises políticas dele e eram de facto brilhantes. Depois veio o último ciclo eleitoral, e Gingrich comportou-se como um verdadeiro guerrilheiro sem quartel contra tudo o que "cheirava" a Obama e a democratas. E esta inconstância, aliada aos muitos esqueletos do seu passado, transforma-o num candidato "fraco". Mas é brilhante, isso não tenho dúvidas.
Nuno Gouveia a 27 de Novembro de 2010 às 19:36

Este fiel seguidor de Era uma vez na América espera, ansiosamente, por um comentário às revelações divulgadas pelo Wikileaks! Votos de coninuação de um bom trabalho!
Anónimo a 29 de Novembro de 2010 às 15:43

arquivos
2017:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2016:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2015:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2014:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2013:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2012:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2011:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


2010:

 J F M A M J J A S O N D


pesquisar neste blog